Online Community

ASA Central

A dynamic online community for ASA members to exchange ideas and best practices, and connect with industry peers in their sector. Visit the site ›
Find Goods & Services

ASA Marketplace

This powerful online resource enables staffing companies to find and access industry supplier information, products and services. Visit the site ›
Daily Publication

Staffing Today Newsletter

Your #1 daily source for news about the workforce industry. With versions available to members and nonmembers. Visit the site ›
Health Care Reform

Affordable Care Act Resources for Staffing

Up-to-date news, resources, interactive tools, and more—all focused on helping ASA members comply with the ACA. Visit the site ›
Advertisers & Exhibitors

Staffing Industry Suppliers

ASA has numerous and diverse marketing opportunities available to help you reach the rapidly growing staffing industry. Visit the site ›
Exclusive Products

ASA Store

From certification packages and study guides to marketing tools and data reports, ASA resources add value to your business. Visit the site ›

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Holds That Time Spent Traveling to and From Assignment Locations May Be Compensable

In a recent ruling, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that employers are required to compensate their employees for time spent traveling between their homes and the location of their travel assignments when the employees will remain at the remote location overnight and when the travel occurs during the employees’ “workday.” In addition to being compensable, the court held that the hours spent traveling count toward weekly overtime.

The decision clarified that the “normal rule” found in 29 CFR §785.35 that employers rely on to avoid paying their employees for the time spent commuting to and from work does not apply when employees travel to a remote location where they will remain overnight for a number of days or weeks. Instead, employers placing employees on travel assignments are required to compensate them for the time spent traveling between their homes and their remote work locations—assuming that travel occurs during the employees’ “workday.” The practical implications of the decision are not entirely clear, because the court declined to explain what constitutes an employee’s “workday,” including in the context of employees whose “workday” differs from assignment to assignment or even within the same assignment.

To read the decision, see Walters v. Professional Labor Group LLC, 120 F. Fourth 546 (Seventh Cir. 2024).